LangGraph vs LlamaIndex
Which should you use? A side-by-side look at what each one does, who it suits, what it costs, how hard it is to set up, and where each falls short.
Open source · MIT
A Python framework for building long-running agents that keep state and can resume after failures.
Open source · MIT
Python framework for building LLM apps that query your own documents and data.
The short answer
Choose LangGraph if you need…
- Python developers building multi-step AI agents that must survive failures or long waits
- Teams that want fine-grained control over agent state and execution flow
- Projects that need a human to review or edit an agent's state partway through a run
- Developers who want a lower-level base instead of a higher-level agent package
Choose LlamaIndex if you need…
- Python developers building retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) apps over private documents
- Teams wanting a modular toolkit where they can swap LLM, embedding and vector store providers
- Developers building agent workflows that query their own data
- Beginners who want a short path to a working document question-answering prototype
Side-by-side
| LangGraph | LlamaIndex | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Library | Library |
| Price | Free and open source | Free and open source |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| GitHub stars | 44.3k | 52.8k |
| Setup difficulty | Intermediate | Intermediate |
| How you get it | Install with a package manager | Install with a package manager |
| Main language | Python | Python |
| Last code update | 4 days ago | 10 days ago |
What each one is
LangGraph
LangGraph is a low-level framework for building workflows and AI agents that keep track of their state over time. It is designed for tasks that run for a long stretch, can pause for human review, and need to pick up where they left off after an interruption. It is produced by LangChain Inc, but the README says it can be used without LangChain.
LlamaIndex
LlamaIndex is an open-source Python framework for connecting large language models to your own data, such as PDFs, documents, APIs and SQL databases. It provides connectors to load data, ways to structure it into indexes, and retrieval tools that feed relevant context to an LLM. The README also notes that the company's main focus has shifted toward its commercial LlamaParse document platform, with the open-source framework still available.
Best for
LangGraph
- Python developers building multi-step AI agents that must survive failures or long waits
- Teams that want fine-grained control over agent state and execution flow
- Projects that need a human to review or edit an agent's state partway through a run
- Developers who want a lower-level base instead of a higher-level agent package
LlamaIndex
- Python developers building retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) apps over private documents
- Teams wanting a modular toolkit where they can swap LLM, embedding and vector store providers
- Developers building agent workflows that query their own data
- Beginners who want a short path to a working document question-answering prototype
Strengths
LangGraph
- Built-in durable execution that resumes workflows from where they stopped, per the README
- Supports human-in-the-loop checkpoints and both short-term and long-term memory
- Open source under the MIT license with extensive documentation and a free course
LlamaIndex
- Large ecosystem of over 300 integration packages, per the README
- Modular design lets you customize or replace components like retrievers and query engines
- Offers both a high-level API for quick starts and lower-level APIs for advanced control
Not ideal for
LangGraph
- Beginners who just want a ready-made agent: the README points to Deep Agents, a higher-level package built on LangGraph, for quicker starts
- Non-programmers, since it is a Python library that requires writing code
- JavaScript/TypeScript-only teams, who are pointed to the separate LangGraph.js project
LlamaIndex
- Non-programmers, since it is a Python library that requires writing code
- Projects that need a fully managed hosted service, because the README points to LlamaParse for the hosted offering and the framework is a toolkit you run yourself
- Users who only need simple one-off document parsing, where a standalone parser may be simpler
Trade-offs
LangGraph
- It is a low-level framework, so it has a steeper learning curve than higher-level tools
- Several of the most useful features (debugging, deployment) point to LangSmith, a separate product
- The README is truncated and does not show full API details, so the depth of specific features is hard to verify from it alone
LlamaIndex
- The README says the company's primary focus has shifted to LlamaParse, so the open-source framework is secondary to its commercial product
- The README is not updated as often as the documentation, so you should check the docs for current details
- Many separate integration packages means you must choose and install the ones you need
Getting started
LlamaIndex
Install core and selected integrations
pip install llama-index-coreAdd an LLM integration
pip install llama-index-llms-openaiFrequently asked questions
What is the difference between LangGraph and LlamaIndex?
LangGraph: A Python framework for building long-running agents that keep state and can resume after failures. LlamaIndex: Python framework for building LLM apps that query your own documents and data. LangGraph suits python developers building multi-step ai agents that must survive failures or long waits, while LlamaIndex suits python developers building retrieval-augmented generation (rag) apps over private documents.
Are LangGraph and LlamaIndex free?
LangGraph: Free and open source. LlamaIndex: Free and open source.
Is LangGraph or LlamaIndex more popular?
LlamaIndex has more GitHub stars (52.8k) than LangGraph (44.3k). Popularity isn't the same as fit — check which one matches your use case above.
What are other alternatives to LangGraph and LlamaIndex?
Other options people compare them with include CrewAI, Deep Agents, OpenAI Agents SDK, PageIndex, LEANN.
Keep comparing
Built from our catalogue entries for both products: open-source details come from each project's README (AI-assisted, refreshed weekly) and GitHub data; AI-tool details are editorial. Spotted something wrong? Let us know from either product's page.