Deep Agents vs LangGraph
Which should you use? A side-by-side look at what each one does, who it suits, what it costs, how hard it is to set up, and where each falls short.
Open source · MIT
An open-source Python agent harness for multi-step AI work, built on LangGraph.
Open source · MIT
A Python framework for building long-running agents that keep state and can resume after failures.
The short answer
Choose Deep Agents if you need…
- Developers building AI agents that run multi-step tasks such as research and writing
- Teams that want a working agent harness they can customize instead of building one from scratch
- People who want to use either hosted or self-hosted language models with the same code
- Developers already using LangChain or LangGraph who want a more opinionated setup
Choose LangGraph if you need…
- Python developers building multi-step AI agents that must survive failures or long waits
- Teams that want fine-grained control over agent state and execution flow
- Projects that need a human to review or edit an agent's state partway through a run
- Developers who want a lower-level base instead of a higher-level agent package
Side-by-side
| Deep Agents | LangGraph | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Library | Library |
| Price | Free and open source | Free and open source |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| GitHub stars | 30.9k | 44.3k |
| Setup difficulty | Intermediate | Intermediate |
| How you get it | Install with a package manager | Install with a package manager |
| Main language | Python | Python |
| Last code update | 4 days ago | 4 days ago |
What each one is
Deep Agents
Deep Agents is a Python (and JavaScript/TypeScript) library that gives you a ready-made AI agent with planning, file access, sub-agents, and context management already included. You can swap in any tool-calling language model and override or replace parts of it. It is built on LangGraph, a framework for agent workflows.
LangGraph
LangGraph is a low-level framework for building workflows and AI agents that keep track of their state over time. It is designed for tasks that run for a long stretch, can pause for human review, and need to pick up where they left off after an interruption. It is produced by LangChain Inc, but the README says it can be used without LangChain.
Best for
Deep Agents
- Developers building AI agents that run multi-step tasks such as research and writing
- Teams that want a working agent harness they can customize instead of building one from scratch
- People who want to use either hosted or self-hosted language models with the same code
- Developers already using LangChain or LangGraph who want a more opinionated setup
LangGraph
- Python developers building multi-step AI agents that must survive failures or long waits
- Teams that want fine-grained control over agent state and execution flow
- Projects that need a human to review or edit an agent's state partway through a run
- Developers who want a lower-level base instead of a higher-level agent package
Strengths
Deep Agents
- Ships with planning, filesystem, sub-agent, and context management features out of the box
- Works with any LLM that supports tool calling, including local and open-weight models
- Built on LangGraph, which the README describes as providing streaming, persistence, and checkpointing
LangGraph
- Built-in durable execution that resumes workflows from where they stopped, per the README
- Supports human-in-the-loop checkpoints and both short-term and long-term memory
- Open source under the MIT license with extensive documentation and a free course
Not ideal for
Deep Agents
- Non-programmers looking for a finished app: the README centers on writing Python code, and the terminal coding agent is a separate feature
- Anyone who needs strict guarantees the agent will not misuse tools, since the README says it follows a "trust the LLM" model and boundaries must be enforced at the tool or sandbox level
- Projects that only need a simple single-call LLM request, since the harness adds more structure than that requires
LangGraph
- Beginners who just want a ready-made agent: the README points to Deep Agents, a higher-level package built on LangGraph, for quicker starts
- Non-programmers, since it is a Python library that requires writing code
- JavaScript/TypeScript-only teams, who are pointed to the separate LangGraph.js project
Trade-offs
Deep Agents
- The README is truncated and does not document every option, so details of configuration depend on the external docs
- Its security model places responsibility on the developer to restrict what tools and sandboxes can do
- It is tied to the LangChain ecosystem, so adopting it means adopting those dependencies
LangGraph
- It is a low-level framework, so it has a steeper learning curve than higher-level tools
- Several of the most useful features (debugging, deployment) point to LangSmith, a separate product
- The README is truncated and does not show full API details, so the depth of specific features is hard to verify from it alone
Getting started
Deep Agents
Add deepagents to a uv project
uv add deepagentsFrequently asked questions
What is the difference between Deep Agents and LangGraph?
Deep Agents: An open-source Python agent harness for multi-step AI work, built on LangGraph. LangGraph: A Python framework for building long-running agents that keep state and can resume after failures. Deep Agents suits developers building ai agents that run multi-step tasks such as research and writing, while LangGraph suits python developers building multi-step ai agents that must survive failures or long waits.
Are Deep Agents and LangGraph free?
Deep Agents: Free and open source. LangGraph: Free and open source.
Is Deep Agents or LangGraph more popular?
LangGraph has more GitHub stars (44.3k) than Deep Agents (30.9k). Popularity isn't the same as fit — check which one matches your use case above.
What are other alternatives to Deep Agents and LangGraph?
Other options people compare them with include LangChain, CrewAI, Pydantic AI, OpenAI Agents SDK, LEANN.
Keep comparing
Built from our catalogue entries for both products: open-source details come from each project's README (AI-assisted, refreshed weekly) and GitHub data; AI-tool details are editorial. Spotted something wrong? Let us know from either product's page.