Skip to content

SVProgressHUD vs SwifterSwift

Which should you use? A side-by-side look at what each one does, who it suits, what it costs, how hard it is to set up, and where each falls short.

SVProgressHUD

Open source · MIT

A simple progress and status overlay for iOS and tvOS apps, written in Objective-C.

SwifterSwift

Open source · MIT

A library of over 500 ready-made Swift extensions that add handy helper methods to common types.

The short answer

Choose SVProgressHUD if you need…

  • iOS developers who need a quick loading indicator for a blocking task
  • Developers maintaining Objective-C codebases that want a drop-in HUD
  • Apps that show brief success or error messages after an action
  • Teams that want to customize the HUD's colors, fonts, and timing app-wide

Choose SwifterSwift if you need…

  • Swift developers building iOS or macOS apps who want common helper methods ready to use
  • Teams that want to pick only the extension groups they need, such as UIKit or CoreLocation
  • Developers who prefer Swift Package Manager, CocoaPods, or Carthage for dependencies

Side-by-side

SVProgressHUDSwifterSwift
TypeLibraryLibrary
PriceFree and open sourceFree and open source
LicenceMITMIT
GitHub stars12.4k15.3k
Setup difficultyBeginnerBeginner
How you get itInstall with a package managerInstall with a package manager
Main languageObjective-CSwift
Last code update8 months ago4 days ago

What each one is

SVProgressHUD

SVProgressHUD is a library that adds a small on-screen overlay to an iOS or tvOS app to show that a task is running, how far along it is, or whether it succeeded or failed. Developers call a few simple methods such as show, dismiss, or showSuccessWithStatus, and the library handles the display. It is meant for short waits where the user needs to wait before moving on.

SwifterSwift

SwifterSwift is a collection of more than 500 Swift extensions, which are small added methods for built-in types like strings, arrays, and UIKit or Cocoa classes. It is meant to save developers from writing the same helper code again and again across iOS, macOS, tvOS, watchOS, Linux, and Android projects.

Best for

SVProgressHUD

  • iOS developers who need a quick loading indicator for a blocking task
  • Developers maintaining Objective-C codebases that want a drop-in HUD
  • Apps that show brief success or error messages after an action
  • Teams that want to customize the HUD's colors, fonts, and timing app-wide

SwifterSwift

  • Swift developers building iOS or macOS apps who want common helper methods ready to use
  • Teams that want to pick only the extension groups they need, such as UIKit or CoreLocation
  • Developers who prefer Swift Package Manager, CocoaPods, or Carthage for dependencies

Strengths

SVProgressHUD

  • Simple API: show and dismiss calls cover most common uses
  • Supports Swift Package Manager, CocoaPods, Carthage, and manual install
  • Customizable through UI_APPEARANCE_SELECTOR, with light, dark, and automatic styles

SwifterSwift

  • Covers a large range of types, with more than 500 extensions organized by module
  • Supports several dependency managers, including Swift Package Manager, CocoaPods, Carthage, and Accio
  • Licensed under MIT, which allows free use in commercial projects

Not ideal for

SVProgressHUD

  • Background refreshes like pull-to-refresh or infinite scrolling, which the README specifically says not to use it for
  • Developers who need a non-Apple platform, since the README covers only iOS and tvOS
  • Projects that want a fully SwiftUI-native indicator, as the README describes UIKit-style customization and does not mention SwiftUI

SwifterSwift

  • Beginners still learning Swift basics, since the library assumes you can read and call extensions yourself
  • Projects that must support Swift versions older than the ones listed in the requirements, because the README points to older tagged releases instead
  • Anyone who wants a full app or framework rather than a set of helper methods

Trade-offs

SVProgressHUD

  • The README is truncated and does not list every property, so the API docs in SVProgressHUD.h are needed for details
  • Haptic feedback is only available on iPhone 7 and newer, per the README
  • Written in Objective-C; the README says it works in Swift but adds bridging steps for manual installs

SwifterSwift

  • Helper methods add to your dependency footprint, and you should check each one fits your needs
  • Requirements are fairly recent, such as iOS 15.0+ and Swift 6.0+, so older projects may not be able to upgrade easily
  • The README is truncated here, so details of individual extensions and the latest release notes were not verified

Getting started

SVProgressHUD

Add to a CocoaPods Podfile, then install

pod install

Clone the repository

git clone https://github.com/SVProgressHUD/SVProgressHUD.git
Step-by-step guide: how to use SVProgressHUD

SwifterSwift

CocoaPods: add to Podfile (all extensions)

pod 'SwifterSwift'

Carthage: add to Cartfile

github "SwifterSwift/SwifterSwift" ~> 6.0
Step-by-step guide: how to use SwifterSwift

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between SVProgressHUD and SwifterSwift?

SVProgressHUD: A simple progress and status overlay for iOS and tvOS apps, written in Objective-C. SwifterSwift: A library of over 500 ready-made Swift extensions that add handy helper methods to common types. SVProgressHUD suits ios developers who need a quick loading indicator for a blocking task, while SwifterSwift suits swift developers building ios or macos apps who want common helper methods ready to use.

Are SVProgressHUD and SwifterSwift free?

SVProgressHUD: Free and open source. SwifterSwift: Free and open source.

Is SVProgressHUD or SwifterSwift more popular?

SwifterSwift has more GitHub stars (15.3k) than SVProgressHUD (12.4k). Popularity isn't the same as fit — check which one matches your use case above.

What are other alternatives to SVProgressHUD and SwifterSwift?

Other options people compare them with include MBProgressHUD, FSCalendar, Eureka, SDWebImage, SwiftyJSON.

Keep comparing

Built from our catalogue entries for both products: open-source details come from each project's README (AI-assisted, refreshed weekly) and GitHub data; AI-tool details are editorial. Spotted something wrong? Let us know from either product's page.