Skip to content

Inferno vs Snabbdom

Which should you use? A side-by-side look at what each one does, who it suits, what it costs, how hard it is to set up, and where each falls short.

Inferno

Open source · MIT

A fast, React-like JavaScript library for building user interfaces in the browser and on servers.

Snabbdom

Open source · MIT

A small, fast virtual DOM library for building and updating web interfaces efficiently.

The short answer

Choose Inferno if you need…

  • Developers already familiar with React who want a React-like API
  • Projects that re-render frequently with real-time data or large DOM trees
  • Teams that want server-side rendering through inferno-server
  • Developers who want to use JSX compiled by Babel, SWC or TypeScript plugins

Choose Snabbdom if you need…

  • Developers building interactive web interfaces who want a small, low-level rendering library
  • Teams that prefer to pick only the modules they need rather than adopt a full framework
  • Projects that need to integrate rendering with functional or reactive (FRP) code
  • Developers who want to read and understand the rendering core end to end

Side-by-side

InfernoSnabbdom
TypeLibraryLibrary
PriceFree and open sourceFree and open source
LicenceMITMIT
GitHub stars16.5k12.4k
Setup difficultyIntermediateIntermediate
How you get itInstall with a package managerInstall with a package manager
Main languageJavaScriptTypeScript
Last code update6 days ago5 months ago

What each one is

Inferno

Inferno is a JavaScript library for building user interfaces, with an API modeled on React, so many React concepts such as components, props and state carry over. Its stated focus is runtime rendering speed, especially for views that update often with real-time data or render large DOM trees. It can render on the client and on the server using inferno-server.

Snabbdom

Snabbdom is a JavaScript library that manages a virtual DOM, a lightweight in-memory description of what a web page should look like. When your app state changes, it compares the new description with the old one and updates only the parts of the real page that changed. Its core is intentionally small, and extra features such as classes, styles, properties and event listeners are added through optional modules.

Best for

Inferno

  • Developers already familiar with React who want a React-like API
  • Projects that re-render frequently with real-time data or large DOM trees
  • Teams that want server-side rendering through inferno-server
  • Developers who want to use JSX compiled by Babel, SWC or TypeScript plugins

Snabbdom

  • Developers building interactive web interfaces who want a small, low-level rendering library
  • Teams that prefer to pick only the modules they need rather than adopt a full framework
  • Projects that need to integrate rendering with functional or reactive (FRP) code
  • Developers who want to read and understand the rendering core end to end

Strengths

Inferno

  • The README describes compile-time JSX optimizations and child flags that can reduce runtime work
  • Familiar React-like API and component model
  • Works without polyfills on tested browsers, per the README's browser support section

Snabbdom

  • The core is about 200 SLOC, so it is easy to read and understand
  • Modular design lets you include only the features you use
  • The README describes it as among the fastest virtual DOM libraries, with a built-in JSX option

Not ideal for

Inferno

  • Teams that depend on the React ecosystem of libraries and tooling, since Inferno is a separate library with its own plugins and compatibility details
  • Beginners looking for a large body of tutorials, because the README does not point to a learning path beyond docs and examples
  • Projects on very old runtimes, since the README lists features v9 requires at runtime (Promise, Array.prototype.includes and others) and recommends checking compatibility for your targets

Snabbdom

  • Beginners looking for a complete framework with routing, state management and tooling included, since the README describes Snabbdom as a focused library
  • Projects that need a large built-in ecosystem of components, as the README lists mainly a few third-party packages

Trade-offs

Inferno

  • Version 10 requires matching v10 versions of the Babel, SWC or TypeScript plugins, and JSX compiled by older plugins will not work
  • Some performance optimizations, such as child flags, depend on developers following contracts the README warns can crash the app if broken
  • Some React-style features differ, so existing React code may need changes

Snabbdom

  • Fewer built-in features than full frameworks; routing and state management are not mentioned in the README
  • Requires following its specific patch and vnode conventions, which are described as necessary for its design
  • Documentation is limited to the README excerpt provided here, so some advanced areas are unclear

Getting started

Inferno

Clone the repository

git clone https://github.com/infernojs/inferno
Step-by-step guide: how to use Inferno

Snabbdom

Clone the repository

git clone https://github.com/snabbdom/snabbdom
Step-by-step guide: how to use Snabbdom

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Inferno and Snabbdom?

Inferno: A fast, React-like JavaScript library for building user interfaces in the browser and on servers. Snabbdom: A small, fast virtual DOM library for building and updating web interfaces efficiently. Inferno suits developers already familiar with react who want a react-like api, while Snabbdom suits developers building interactive web interfaces who want a small, low-level rendering library.

Are Inferno and Snabbdom free?

Inferno: Free and open source. Snabbdom: Free and open source.

Is Inferno or Snabbdom more popular?

Inferno has more GitHub stars (16.5k) than Snabbdom (12.4k). Popularity isn't the same as fit — check which one matches your use case above.

What are other alternatives to Inferno and Snabbdom?

Other options people compare them with include React, Preact, Svelte, Solid, MDX.

Keep comparing

Built from our catalogue entries for both products: open-source details come from each project's README (AI-assisted, refreshed weekly) and GitHub data; AI-tool details are editorial. Spotted something wrong? Let us know from either product's page.