fx vs oha
Which should you use? A side-by-side look at what each one does, who it suits, what it costs, how hard it is to set up, and where each falls short.
Open source · MIT
A terminal tool for viewing and processing JSON interactively.
Open source · MIT
A command-line tool that sends many HTTP requests to a web server and shows live results.
The short answer
Choose fx if you need…
- Developers who work with JSON output from APIs or log files in the terminal
- People who want to explore a JSON document interactively instead of reading raw text
- Users who prefer keyboard-driven terminal tools
Choose oha if you need…
- Developers checking how an API or website handles many simultaneous requests
- Backend engineers comparing performance before and after a change
- People who prefer a terminal tool with a live view over reading raw output
- Users who want to set a request rate limit or test over HTTP/2
Side-by-side
| fx | oha | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | CLI | CLI |
| Price | Free and open source | Free and open source |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| GitHub stars | 20.7k | 10.7k |
| Setup difficulty | Beginner | Beginner |
| How you get it | Download the app | Install with a package manager |
| Main language | Go | Rust |
| Last code update | 15 days ago | 4 days ago |
What each one is
fx
fx is a command-line program that lets you browse JSON data in an interactive terminal view and run processing on it. It is useful when raw JSON from an API or file is hard to read as plain text. The README is brief and points to fx.wtf for full documentation.
oha
oha is a command-line program that sends a large number of HTTP requests to a web address to see how it performs under load. While it runs, it shows a live terminal display with progress and results. It is written in Rust and is inspired by the older hey tool.
Best for
fx
- Developers who work with JSON output from APIs or log files in the terminal
- People who want to explore a JSON document interactively instead of reading raw text
- Users who prefer keyboard-driven terminal tools
oha
- Developers checking how an API or website handles many simultaneous requests
- Backend engineers comparing performance before and after a change
- People who prefer a terminal tool with a live view over reading raw output
- Users who want to set a request rate limit or test over HTTP/2
Strengths
fx
- Open source under the MIT license
- Widely starred project with an active repository (last push listed as 2026-10-22)
- Ships prebuilt binaries for Linux, macOS, and Windows
oha
- Live terminal display shows progress while the test runs
- Many options cover headers, bodies, authentication, TLS certificates and HTTP versions
- Available through several package managers and as pre-built binaries for major operating systems
Not ideal for
fx
- People who need a graphical JSON editor, since fx runs in the terminal
- Anyone needing details on specific processing syntax, since the README does not describe it and the documentation lives on the external site
oha
- Testing a whole user journey across many steps, since the README describes sending requests to a URL rather than scripted scenarios
- Anyone needing a graphical interface, since the tool is terminal-based
- Testing live production systems without permission, because heavy load can cause outages
Trade-offs
fx
- The README is short and defers most details to the external documentation site
- Install commands and processing syntax are not shown in the provided README
oha
- The README describes some features as experimental, such as HTTP/3 support
- Behavior differs from the similar hey tool in places, such as how -q is applied, so existing scripts may need changes
- Large numbers of connections may require raising the system's open-file limit, as the README notes
Getting started
fx
Download a release binary for your platform from the GitHub releases page
git clone https://github.com/antonmedv/fxoha
Install via Cargo
cargo install ohaInstall on macOS with Homebrew
brew install ohaFrequently asked questions
What is the difference between fx and oha?
fx: A terminal tool for viewing and processing JSON interactively. oha: A command-line tool that sends many HTTP requests to a web server and shows live results. fx suits developers who work with json output from apis or log files in the terminal, while oha suits developers checking how an api or website handles many simultaneous requests.
Are fx and oha free?
fx: Free and open source. oha: Free and open source.
Is fx or oha more popular?
fx has more GitHub stars (20.7k) than oha (10.7k). Popularity isn't the same as fit — check which one matches your use case above.
What are other alternatives to fx and oha?
Other options people compare them with include gron, Vegeta, http-server.
Keep comparing
Built from our catalogue entries for both products: open-source details come from each project's README (AI-assisted, refreshed weekly) and GitHub data; AI-tool details are editorial. Spotted something wrong? Let us know from either product's page.