Skip to content

Bruno vs Scalar

Which should you use? A side-by-side look at what each one does, who it suits, what it costs, how hard it is to set up, and where each falls short.

Bruno

Open source · MIT

Free, offline-first desktop app for exploring and testing APIs, storing collections as files.

Scalar

Open source · MIT

Turns OpenAPI/Swagger documents into interactive API docs and includes an API testing client.

The short answer

Choose Bruno if you need…

  • Developers who want to test HTTP or GraphQL APIs without an account or cloud sync
  • Teams that already keep code in Git and want API collections stored alongside it
  • People who want to run API test collections in CI/CD using the Bruno CLI
  • Users who care about keeping API data on their own device

Choose Scalar if you need…

  • Developers who already maintain an OpenAPI or Swagger document
  • Teams that want readable, interactive API documentation
  • Developers who want to test endpoints from the same tool they use for docs
  • Backend developers using a supported framework such as FastAPI, Hono, or Express

Side-by-side

BrunoScalar
TypeAppApp
PriceFree and open sourceFree and open source
LicenceMITMIT
GitHub stars48k16.4k
Setup difficultyBeginnerBeginner
How you get itDownload the appUse it in the browser (or self-host)
Main languageJavaScriptTypeScript
Last code update4 days ago5 days ago

What each one is

Bruno

Bruno is a desktop app for sending requests to APIs and checking the responses, similar in purpose to Postman or Insomnia. It saves your request collections as plain-text files in a folder on your computer, so they can be versioned with Git and shared like any other project files. The README states it is offline-only and has no plans for cloud sync.

Scalar

Scalar is an open-source project that takes an OpenAPI (Swagger) description of a web API and turns it into a browsable, interactive reference page. It also includes an API client for sending test requests, and the README says it can generate code examples in many languages. Developers use it to document and try out their APIs without building that interface themselves.

Best for

Bruno

  • Developers who want to test HTTP or GraphQL APIs without an account or cloud sync
  • Teams that already keep code in Git and want API collections stored alongside it
  • People who want to run API test collections in CI/CD using the Bruno CLI
  • Users who care about keeping API data on their own device

Scalar

  • Developers who already maintain an OpenAPI or Swagger document
  • Teams that want readable, interactive API documentation
  • Developers who want to test endpoints from the same tool they use for docs
  • Backend developers using a supported framework such as FastAPI, Hono, or Express

Strengths

Bruno

  • Collections are stored as plain files, which works well with Git and other version control
  • Works offline and keeps data on the local device, per the README
  • Available for Mac, Windows and Linux, with the CLI usable in automated pipelines

Scalar

  • Free and open-source under the MIT license
  • Renders OpenAPI/Swagger documents with an interactive reference view
  • Offers a single-HTML-file setup that needs no build step

Not ideal for

Bruno

  • Teams that need cloud-synced collections across machines, since the README says Bruno is offline-only and has no plans for cloud sync
  • People looking for a hosted service with built-in team dashboards, as the README describes Bruno as a local tool with paid versions for extra features

Scalar

  • People without an OpenAPI document, since the README centers on rendering existing OpenAPI specs rather than writing them
  • Users who need an API client only for non-OpenAPI workflows, as the README emphasizes OpenAPI support
  • Anyone needing a fully self-hosted setup without reviewing the README, since the quickstart example loads assets and a proxy from scalar.com and jsDelivr CDN

Trade-offs

Bruno

  • The README does not describe the full feature set, so specific capabilities need checking in the documentation
  • Cloud sync and team hosting are not offered; the README points to paid versions for additional features
  • The README is truncated, so details on paid tiers and edge-case behavior are unclear

Scalar

  • The README is truncated, so full feature and configuration details are not confirmed here
  • The quickstart depends on external CDN and proxy URLs rather than local files alone
  • The latest release has no binaries, so the desktop download path is only described on the project's website

Getting started

Bruno

Install on Mac via Homebrew

brew install bruno

Install the Bruno CLI from npm

npm install -g @usebruno/cli
Step-by-step guide: how to use Bruno

Scalar

Install the coding agent skill (optional)

npx skills add scalar/scalar --skill scalar-api-reference

Clone the repository

git clone https://github.com/scalar/scalar
Step-by-step guide: how to use Scalar

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Bruno and Scalar?

Bruno: Free, offline-first desktop app for exploring and testing APIs, storing collections as files. Scalar: Turns OpenAPI/Swagger documents into interactive API docs and includes an API testing client. Bruno suits developers who want to test http or graphql apis without an account or cloud sync, while Scalar suits developers who already maintain an openapi or swagger document.

Are Bruno and Scalar free?

Bruno: Free and open source. Scalar: Free and open source.

Is Bruno or Scalar more popular?

Bruno has more GitHub stars (48k) than Scalar (16.4k). Popularity isn't the same as fit — check which one matches your use case above.

What are other alternatives to Bruno and Scalar?

Other options people compare them with include Hoppscotch, AI Website Cloner, Redoc.

Keep comparing

Built from our catalogue entries for both products: open-source details come from each project's README (AI-assisted, refreshed weekly) and GitHub data; AI-tool details are editorial. Spotted something wrong? Let us know from either product's page.